Maybe if it does well enough someone will consign the incredibly bad one!
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
The original Godzilla Australian daybill currently up for auction with Bruce.
Unfortunately it isn't the favourite crappy re-release RFD 'Incredible Tital Of Terror' tagline fan daybill that everyone seems to like.
I will be interested in seeing how this version fares. Have a feeling it will perform well,
My feeling of this poster performing well is certainly proving to be the case. Of the 102 Australian film posters currently up for auction, Godzilla is currently the number one bid on poster, with a current bid of $210. With a further 5 days and 14 hours remaining it certainly will be interesting to see what the final price will be.
The Final price recorded for this poster that has just sold is $385. For a similar designed poster previously auctioned by Bruce the highest price paid being $129 in 2016. A huge increase in price recorded with this latest version.
The following rare and much discussed re-release poster of Godzilla is one that surely if ever offered by Bruce would fetch much more than the just sold original version.
PLEASE someone send it to me. The suspense of what it would sell for is killing me!
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
I'm almost tempted to send it over...if i only had a spare!
I can't recall seeing another copy so I don't expect I'd be able to repurchase it.
I know you can't accurately predict, but what do people think it would get?
With a number of really serious bidders involved how about a conservative $700.
Hopefully we will get to see a copy turn up at Bruces one day. I am thinking though anyone who may have a copy of this very rare daybill most likely intends to hang on to it.
Have you had your copy for long? Hopefully you managed to purchase it at a reasonable price.
I don't remember where i got it or how much i paid, but it certainly wasn't $700! I have The Raven and House of Dracula daybills that also got good results at this week's sales, but same problem only one copy.
I don't remember where i got it or how much i paid, but it certainly wasn't $700! I have The Raven and House of Dracula daybills that also got good results at this week's sales, but same problem only one copy.
The same buyer bought the three posters that you mentioned Rick. I'm sure this buyer would be a strong contender for the Godzilla daybill if one ever appears.
I'd be tempted to break my don't sell only copy policy at $700US!
Please consider it more. The result might shock you!
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Due to the current conversation taking place on the Hondo's This And That thread regarding poor artwork I thought that I would re-introduce this thread as it ties in well, and some of our newer members that may not have viewed it.
Regarding Godzilla, has anyone ever seen another copy?
I found that Bruce once sold a copy of a 1960's re-release copy of a Godzilla daybill in 2003. No vision is available on the website but a 1960's poster has to the Regent re-issue version that you are speaking about. The only poster image I found is the following one from an unknown source, and it doesn't appear to be the same image as the one you have,
Differences between the two images are as follows.-
The top of the head of Godzilla is blue on one poster and black on the other. Also on one of the posters there ia a small white marking on the chest of Godzilla that doesn't appear on the other copy. Were there perhaps two different printings done?
I have just noticed the black section under the Raymond Burr name has some of it's edges ever so slightly different on one than on the other. The Suitable Only For Adults censorship rating wording if much more distinct on one copy that the other.
I'm assuming they were hand screen printed where they put blobs of paint on a screen and squeegee it onto paper, that would explain the variations, and also allow for small print runs at low expense. Does that sound right? We used to do that at school in art classes.
I'm assuming they were hand screen printed where they put blobs of paint on a screen and squeegee it onto paper, that would explain the variations, and also allow for small print runs at low expense. Does that sound right? We used to do that at school in art classes.
Printing of the film poster process isn't a very familiar subject for me, so I cannot comment with anything else.
I'm assuming they were hand screen printed where they put blobs of paint on a screen and squeegee it onto paper, that would explain the variations, and also allow for small print runs at low expense. Does that sound right? We used to do that at school in art classes.
Printing of the film poster process isn't a very familiar subject for me, so I cannot comment with anything else.
Check this video out to see how small screen print runs can be done quickly and cheaply, that could be why there aren't many of these posters around.
Checked out the video and now know all about the screen printing process.
My problem here is that the Godzilla poster in question was printed in early 1960's. I have now read on Google that screen printing wasn't a standard practice for poster printing, and didn't commence being used in Australia until the 1970's
My thought though is that it wasn't a standard printing and could have been done by a smaller company that specialised in hand screen printing. Hand screen printing has been used for centuries.
Comments
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
The following rare and much discussed re-release poster of Godzilla is one that surely if ever offered by Bruce would fetch much more than the just sold original version.
Anyone agree?
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Hopefully we will get to see a copy turn up at Bruces one day. I am thinking though anyone who may have a copy of this very rare daybill most likely intends to hang on to it.
Have you had your copy for long? Hopefully you managed to purchase it at a reasonable price.
Peter
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
The Comedy Of Terrors (1963) post November 1971 Roadshow re-issue one sheet poster. Originally released by Regent Films in 1968.
The poster has an error printed on it. The NSC censorship should have been printed as being NRC,
The poster artist certainly used his imagination in designing this poster.
The top of the head of Godzilla is blue on one poster and black on the other. Also on one of the posters there ia a small white marking on the chest of Godzilla that doesn't appear on the other copy. Were there perhaps two different printings done?
Peter
Peter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj0CRNrRi2I
Peter
My problem here is that the Godzilla poster in question was printed in early 1960's. I have now read on Google that screen printing wasn't a standard practice for poster printing, and didn't commence being used in Australia until the 1970's
Peter