Skip to content

Road To Singapore ( 1940 ) Daybill

 Two different Road To Singapore ( 1940 ) daybills. Both very nice but what period are they from ?  Are they original, early second printing, later second printing or re-release ? Something I have also noticed is no Australian daybill appears to have surfaced for Road To Zanzibar ( 1941 ). Does anyone have a copy of at least seen one ? As a matter of fact no one sheet, three sheet or any other Australian paper have I ever spotted for Road To Zanzibar. 
«1

Comments

  • Both are nice Daybills! More colorful version seems to be the obvious choice for the first release, but that's my very uneducated Daybill offering... ;)

    As for Zanzibar, the 3rd U.S. One sheet in about 20 years from either EMP or HA, just sold---I've never seen any Aussie paper on it. Would be nice to see how they designed it. 

    ***Question Lawrence---US distributors released press books or campaign books...did this ever happen for Australian paper? 
  • based on the printer details at the bottom of the duo tone, plus the rating I would say that would be likely for the original release.  I have a few duo tone Richardsons like this which are a mirror of their more colourful friend.

    So the second would be a later re-release?...Don't think I have ever seen a Richardson studio RR daybill!?


    As for Road to Zanzibar, I haven't seen one in my few years in the hobby...

  • edited July 2016
    @Ves   Did "not suitable for children" come after "not suitable for general exhibition"? Was "...general exhibition" discontinued?

    or was "children" more specific to later titles of other films...

    -there are more printer details on the duo-tone...is that what your referring to? 


  • Hey Mark,

    Yes, NOT SUITABLE FOR GENERAL EXHIBITION was used prior to the NOT SUITABLE FOR CHILDREN rating, so this helps to date a poster.  Anything NSFGE is quite early on.  I think this was discontinued early 40s, but I can't remember off the top of my head...I'm sure it is on this forum somewhere, if not Lawrence will have the info for us.

    As for the printing details in the border, early RICHARDSON studio posters have more details added, then just the This is a Richardson Studio Poster like the RR (if that is what it is) or whatever the exact terminology is.  I can't remember off the top of my head what it says, but I've only seen it on Richardson Studio daybills.

    If I get a chance later today, I will jump on my other PC and upload a close up of what you can find on the earlier Richardsons. 

  • Great info Ves, thanks. Printer details hard to read without clear image or poster in hand.

     ...leave it to the mysterious Daybill to have the more colorful version be the later release. 
  • I think the duo tone will have a more colourful partner...there are many instances of this.

    Will upload some examples a bit later of this as well.

  • So the second would be a later re-release?...Don't think I have ever seen a Richardson studio RR daybill!

    Richardson did do some re-releases.
  • Do you have any titles or images you can share?
  • Four clues appear on the posters. Only two have been discussed so far. Good imput so far from Mark and Ves.

    Firstly the Not Suitable For General Exhibition rating was altered to Not Suitable For Children in Australia in 1948. This means that the Colourful Road To Singapore poster pictured above is post 1948.

  • HONDO said:

    So the second would be a later re-release?...Don't think I have ever seen a Richardson studio RR daybill!

    Richardson did do some re-releases.
    Do you have any titles or images you can share?


    Samson And Delilah

    North West Mounted Police

    You have the Samson And Delilah daybill Ves.


  • Paramount logo?
  • OH OF COURSE!

    Samson and Delilah!  DUH!

  • hard to tell from the picture, but size...is the duo tone a little one?  what is it 10x30?
  • hard to tell from the picture, but size...is the duo tone a little one?  what is it 10x30?

    It is a 13'' x 30''.
    Paramount logo?

    Brilliant Ves and an additional clue as well.
  • edited July 2016
    What is important for me to know, to be100% accurate, is that on the colourful Not Suitable For Children daybill the following -''Printed By F. Cunninghame & Co.Pty.Ltd. & Co Pty Ltd Sydney'' appears. Very hard to read but the arrangement of the words and size would indicate to me if is F. Cunninghame. Thoughts please? Better still can anyone enlarge it so it can be clearly read? This is possibly ( most likely ) the sixth clue.
  • Amt of printing details & rating verbiage is all I can add...

    *** the printing details are more clear in the EMP website. 

    Good info Lawrence. 
  • Amt of printing details & rating verbiage is all I can add...

    *** the printing details are more clear in the EMP website. 

    Good info Lawrence. 


    Thanks Mark.

    The EMP poster info I am O.K. with -  it is the other poster I am after help with.

  • edited July 2016


    Seems to appear on the WE Smith printed posters

  • Good images Ves and they tell a story.
  • Ves what about the four line credits on the bottom of the Richardson /Paramount daybills ? You have a lot of them.
  • four line credits?

    You mean like the one I posted above the Bahama Passage daybills?

    I can post larger images if you like...or are you talking about something else?

  • four line credits?

    You mean like the one I posted above the Bahama Passage daybills?

    I can post larger images if you like...or are you talking about something else?


    The image you posted from Bahama Passage in two lines only. There are other daybills with four lines of credits appearing on the bottom of the posters on other Richardson / Paramount posters.

  • hmmm...let me go see!
  • These ones?

    Sorry I assumed they were the same as the one I posted earlier...

    Had to chop into two...wouldn't fit.

    Left side

    Right Side

  • Nice Joe E. Brown poster of Champion Chumps ( aka $1000 A Touchdown in the U.S.A. ) from 1939. This four line credited style doesn't figure in our discussion regarding Roads To Singapore though, but the two line and one line credits do fit in with solving the overall puzzle.



  • Nice Joe E. Brown poster of Champion Chumps ( aka $1000 A Touchdown in the U.S.A. ) from 1939. This four line credited style doesn't figure in our discussion regarding Roads To Singapore though, but the two line and one line credits do fit in with solving the overall puzzle.
  • I would like to say with great conviction that neither of the two daybill posters of Road To Singapore appearing on this thread were printed or used in Australia when the film was released here in 1940. That is all I care to comment on at the present time and hopefully some more discussion will take place before I divulge anything else on the subject, except to say that the censorship rating firmly established that one poster is post 1948 and there are five more remaining clues available to help supply some answers on the posters release dates. I haven't divulged my four remaining clues but Ves did suggest maybe the Paramount logo, and this is now a fifth one. It is a valid clue so well done Ves.
Sign In or Register to comment.






Logo

For movie poster collectors who know...

@ 2025 Vintage Movie Posters Forum, All rights reserved.

Contact us

info@vintagemoviepostersforum.com

Get In Touch