The Science Fiction Quiz

Comments

• dedeposter

  July 30

  Is 260 Jurassic Park 1993?

  
  
  Peter

  0
• jayn_j

  July 30

  261 is Red Planet Mars

  0
• HONDO

  July 30

  dedeposter said:

  Is 260 Jurassic Park 1993?

  It certainly is, so well done.
  
   
  

  1
• HONDO

  July 30

  jayn_j said:

  261 is Red Planet Mars

  Correct, and I had thought that this one would be a little difficult to answer, but happily not the vase. Red Planet Mar from 1952. 
  
   
  

  0
• HONDO

  August 14

   262  263
  Your latest image challenges.

  0
• dedeposter

  August 14

  C262 Return of the Jedi (1983) 

  
  
  Peter

  0
• HONDO

  August 14

  dedeposter said:

  C262 Return of the Jedi (1983) 

  Correct and well done. It does appear that you know your Star Wars films as you had answered the recent Star Wars (1977) film image also.
  
   
  

  0
• HONDO

  August 17

  A clue for 263 is Stalag 17.

  0
• jayn_j

  August 17

  263 Target Earth.
  Never seen or even heard of it

  0
• Bruce

  August 17

  I never saw Target Earth either, but recognized the image right off, because of the funky shaped robot with a codpiece!

  HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com
  HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
  HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
  HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
  HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
  HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
  
  HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
  HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
  HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
  HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
  HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
  HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
  

  
  

  0
• HONDO

  August 18

  jayn_j said:

  263 Target Earth.
  Never seen or even heard of it

  Bruce said:

  I never saw Target Earth either, but recognized the image right off, because of the funky shaped robot with a codpiece!

  Both of you with the same correct answer so well done. seeing that my clue was so obscure, and possibly could have been somewhat misleading. Target Earth from 1954,
  
   
  

  0
• HONDO

  August 27

  
   264  265
  Two new images to have a think about.

  0
• dedeposter

  August 27

  C264 looks like one of the robots from Earth vs The Flying Saucers (1956), one of my earliest memories of sci fi.
  
  C265 is too easy!

  
  
  Peter

  0
• HONDO

  August 28

  dedeposter said:

  C264 looks like one of the robots from Earth vs The Flying Saucers (1956), one of my earliest memories of sci fi.
  

  Correct, and hopefully they are fond memories.
  

  0
• HONDO

  August 28

  dedeposter said:

  C265 is too easy!

  yes you are most likely correct. Too much given away.

  0
• Rick

  August 28

  Is that ET?

  0
• HONDO

  August 28

  Rick said:

  Is that ET?

  Yes 265 is certainly E.T. The Extra Terrestrial from 1982. Well done.
  
   
  

  0
• HONDO

  September 3

   266  267
  Over to you.

  0
• theartofmovieposters

  1:40AM

  267 The Martian

  0
• jayn_j

  2:33AM

  266 Jules Verne's Master of the World

  0
• HONDO

  7:35AM

  theartofmovieposters said:

  267 The Martian

  Correct and well spotted. The Martian from 2015.
  
   
  

  0
• HONDO

  7:58AM

  jayn_j said:

  266 Jules Verne's Master of the World

  Correct and also well spotted. Master Of The World from 1961, In my earlier posted image Vincent Price can be seen on the far left..
  
   
  

  1
• dedeposter

  9:37AM

  This is my Master of The World Quad purchased years ago, I only noticed the signature years later, no idea if it's genuine or not, but it wasn't purchased as autographed.

  
  
  Peter

  0
• HONDO

  12:11PM edited 12:12PM

  I guess that you probably will never know if it is his signature or not, A nice poster though.

  0
• dedeposter

  1:48PM

  I've checked and it certainly looks like his signature, and it came from a long time collector who had other autographed pieces in his collection, so perhaps he forgot he had it? I'll never know, but if I ever sell it I'll say it's  genuine!  

  
  
  Peter

  1